Human Cloning Essay Example

Human Cloning Essay Example Human Cloning Essay Human Cloning Essay Human Cloning BY DJS010679 The first animal cloning started around the early 1950s. During this time, the first thing to be cloned was a northern leopard frog by Robert Briggs and Thomas King. This experiment was to learn how the cells would activate and deactivate during the cell development. His tadpole that he cloned didnt survive into adult hood, but it helped future cloning be more successful. Now in my opinion isnt so bad. Cloning a frog to learn a simple cell development may actually help us more in the future. It could teaches how disorders or disease may be created and show us how to reverse hem before conditions get worse. Another animal was cloned around the late 1990s. The lamb named Dolly was the first vertebrate animal to be cloned. She was the most the most famous because instead of using an embryo, they used an adult cell to clone Dolly. This experiment was to help research into producing medicines in the milk of farm animals. While this was one of the most significant achievements, it started too raised up ethnical concerns. After Dolly was cloned by scientist, other animal such as mice, rabbis, horses, donkeys, pigs, goats and cattle started to be clone. This is was a good experiment in my opinion. Knowing that we can clone animals helps us be able produce more animals that we need for food purposes. Having more animals means we can never really have a food shortage. This would be a good way to help world hunger become less of a problem. Cloning animals dont seem bad to me at all. We could use cloned animals in the zoos instead of animals from the wild. Cloning animals can help with food shortages problem that we may have in the future. It helps increase populations in animals that may go extinct such as lions, tigers, cheetahs, and elephants. It may even be able to bring back extinct animals such as the mammoths. Cloning existing animals for good purposes like world hunger would be an excellent idea, but cloning animals to harm other living beings would be a terrible idea. Cloning would have its pros and cons. It would depend on the scientist and the scientists intentions with how he uses the clones. Since scientist are now able to make genetic mapping, it can be used to help us learn more about who we are and what has made us the way we are. Genetic also shows us what makes us sick and help scientist develop cures diseases and genetic iseases. Scientist believes that genetic may even be able to show us where we came from and our origins. Although genetic mapping may have its pros with helping us find our origins and help cure diseases by looking at our genetics, there are always the cons. If people can find out genetics and what we are allergic too and what makes us sick, they could use that against other people. With genetic mapping there are pros and cons, but the cons would seem too dangerous to even mess with. With genetic mapping, it can show us where we came from. It can show us if we are elated to certain animals and how much. Scientists have said we are primates of apes and monkeys. With genetic mapping it can show us how much we relate to the apes and monkeys and get closer to finding our origin of place and our very first ancestors. I mean who wouldnt want to know where we orgnated? Things we have invented like life support is greatly a benefit for humans. Life support helps humans live longer. It even Just gives them a second chance at life. Without life support, numans wouldnt nave a great IITe expectancy Ilke we nave today. It nelps give people ope that their loved ones will survive and be able to live longer. Life support is one of the best things humanity has ever created. The creation of defibrillator has about the same affect of life support. Defibrillators can also give a second chance to humans. It allows a person that died for a short duration of time, able to come back to life. Defibrillators allow pulses of electricity into your body so your body your. The electrical pulses allow your heart to get back into rhythm and contract properly so it can pump blood properly. Defibrillators are also one of the best things humanity has ver created. We were able to make prosthetic body parts to help replace body parts that we lost or never had. Its helped some people gain movement not possible to them before. For people without legs or arms, prosthetic legs or arms that mimic movements the same as a real human body part. Weve made metal parts for our internal body Just like metal plantings in our heads or metal heart pieces. All of these fake parts have helped people live happily and healthier. Knowing what scientist have helped create with their idea, I could say they are trying to be god like. Scientists are always trying to find a way to improve humanity and help us live longer. Just like when Chinese invented gunpowder that was supposed to be a substance for eternal life, but it became a substance for death till this day. Although scientist may have messed up on gunpowder, they always find a way to counter their mistakes. Just like how gunpowder was made, bulletproof vest were made. Scientists dont necessarily try to be god like, but try to achieve the impossible so they can make it possible. For instance, about 500 years ago, flying the skies was like a fantasy. People didnt think it was possible, but it became possible. Without going beyond and thinking outside the box, we will never know what we can achieve. So I would say I dont think scientist have gone too far. They Just made mistakes on the way, but humans make mistakes called human error. History of Cloning (1950s-1970s). ThinkQuest. Oracle Foundation, n. d. Web. 05 June 2013.. Cloning. HowStuffWorks. N. p. , n. d. Web. 05 June 2013.. Freudenrich, Craig. AnimalResearch. lnfoThe Global Resource for Scientific Evidence in Animal Research. Cloning Dolly the Sheep. N. p. , n. d. Web. 06 June 2013.. MNN Mother Nature Network. MNN Mother Nature Network. N. p. , n. d. Web. 06 June 2013.. Rhodes, Alexander. Connexions. Connexions. N. p. , n. d. Web. 06 June 2013.. Mealclne, w ON Ill M. D. , Executive Dean Tor Cllnlcal ATTalrs, unlverslty 0T Mlaml Miller School of. What Is A Defibrillator And How Does It Work? ABC News. ABC News Network, 20 Nov. 2008. Web. 06 June 2013. http://abcnews. go. com/Health/ HeartRhythmTreatment/story? id=5226012 Ross, Cody. China Gunpowder. China Gunpowder. N. p. , n. d. Web. 06 June 2013..

An Overview of the Book Democracy in America

An Overview of the Book Democracy in America Democracy in America, written by Alexis de Tocqueville between 1835 and 1840, is considered one of the most comprehensive and insightful books ever written about the U.S. Having seen the failed attempts at a democratic government in his native France, Tocqueville set out to study a stable and prosperous democracy in order to gain insight into how it worked. Democracy in America is the result of his studies. The book was and still remains, so popular because it deals with issues such as religion, the press, money, class structure, racism, the role of government, and the judicial system – issues that are just as relevant today as they were then. ​Many colleges in the U.S. continue to use Democracy in America in political science and history courses. There are two volumes to Democracy in America. Volume one was published in 1835 and is more optimistic of the two. It focuses mainly on the structure of government and the institutions that help maintain freedom in the United States. Volume two, published in 1840, focuses more on individuals and the effects that the democratic mentality has on the norms and thoughts that exist in society. Tocqueville’s main purpose in writing Democracy in America was to analyze the functioning of political society and the various forms of political associations, although he also had some reflections on civil society as well as the relations between political and civil society. He ultimately seeks to understand the true nature of American political life and why it was so different from Europe. Topics Covered Democracy in America covers a vast array of topics. In Volume I, Tocqueville discusses things such as: the social condition of Anglo-Americans; judicial power in the United States and its influence on political society; the United States Constitution; freedom of press; political associations; the advantages of a democratic government; the consequences of democracy; and the future of the races in the United States. In Volume II of the book, Tocqueville covers topics such as: How religion in the United States avails itself to democratic tendencies; Roman Catholicism in the United States; pantheism; equality and the perfectibility of man; science; literature; art; how democracy has modified the English language; spiritual fanaticism; education; and equality of the sexes. Features of American Democracy Tocqueville’s studies of democracy in the United States led him to the conclusion that American society is characterized by five key features: 1. Love of equality: Americans love equality even more than we love individual liberty or freedom (Volume 2, Part 2, Chapter 1). 2. Absence of tradition: Americans inhabit a landscape largely without inherited institutions and traditions (family, class, religion) that define their relations to one another (Volume 2, Part 1, Chapter 1). 3. Individualism: Because no person is intrinsically better than another, Americans begin to seek all reasons in themselves, looking not to tradition nor to the wisdom of singular individuals, but to their own opinion for guidance (Volume 2, Part 2, Chapter 2). 4. Tyranny of the majority: At the same time, Americans give great weight to, and feel great pressure from, the opinion of the majority. Precisely because they are all equal, they feel insignificant and weak in contrast to the greater number (Volume 1, Part 2, Chapter 7). 5. Importance of free association: Americans have a happy impulse to work together to improve their common life, most obviously by forming voluntary associations. This uniquely American art of association tempers their tendencies towards individualism and gives them a habit and taste for serving others (Volume 2, Part 2, Chapters 4 and 5). Predictions for America Tocqueville is often acclaimed for making a number of correct predictions in Democracy in America. First, he anticipated that the debate over the abolition of slavery could potentially tear apart the United States, which it did during the American Civil War. Second, he predicted that the United States and Russia would rise as rival superpowers, and they did after World War II. Some scholars also argue that Tocqueville, in his discussion of the rise of the industrial sector in the American economy, correctly predicted that an industrial aristocracy would rise from the ownership of labor. In the book, he warned that â€Å"friends of democracy must keep an anxious eye peeled in this direction at all times† and went on to say that a new found wealthy class may potentially dominate society. According to Tocqueville, democracy would also have some unfavorable consequences, including the tyranny of the majority over thought, a preoccupation with material goods, and isolating individuals from each other and society. Source: Tocqueville, Democracy in America (Harvey Mansfield and Delba Winthrop, trans., ed.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000)